Chemical Oxygen Generation (COG) is a process that is employed in the aviation industry to produce pure oxygen for use in aircraft. COG has several advantages over traditional gaseous canisters which are commonly used in aircraft today. In this blog post, we will explore the advantages of COG over gaseous canisters in detail.

Firstly, COG is lighter in weight when compared to gaseous canisters. This is because the chemical process that is involved in COG is more efficient in producing oxygen than gaseous canisters. In fact, COG can produce up to ten times more oxygen than gaseous canisters of the same weight. This makes COG a more efficient and economical option as it reduces the weight of the aircraft and increases fuel efficiency.

Secondly, COG is safer than gaseous canisters. This is because gaseous canisters are pressurized containers that can pose a safety risk in case of a leak or rupture. On the other hand, COG does not use pressurized containers and hence the risk of a safety incident is significantly reduced.

Thirdly, COG is more consistent in its production of oxygen than gaseous canisters. This is because COG produces oxygen through a chemical reaction that is controlled by a computerized system. The system ensures that the reaction is consistent and that the quality of the oxygen produced is of a high standard. Gaseous canisters, on the other hand, rely on pressure to produce oxygen which can lead to inconsistencies in the quality of the oxygen produced.

Fourthly, COG is more environmentally friendly than gaseous canisters. This is because COG produces oxygen through a chemical reaction that does not rely on the burning of fossil fuels. Gaseous canisters, on the other hand, rely on fossil fuels for their production which contributes to air pollution and global warming.

Lastly, COG is more cost-effective than gaseous canisters in the long run. Although COG has a higher initial cost than gaseous canisters, it has a lower operational cost over time. This is because COG produces oxygen more efficiently which reduces the cost of producing oxygen in the long run.

In conclusion, Chemical Oxygen Generation is a more efficient, safer, consistent, environmentally friendly and cost-effective option when compared to gaseous canisters. As the aviation industry continues to evolve, COG will play a significant role in the production of oxygen on board aircraft leading to safer and more efficient air travel.